Home > Cannot Be > Why Certain Operators Cannot Be Overloaded

Why Certain Operators Cannot Be Overloaded

Contents

That means you can't invent new operators. So my question is more of why is this not possible rather than how, as I know it cannot be done. Consider: extern MyObject * ObjectPointer; bool Function1() { return ObjectPointer != null; } bool Function2() { return ObjectPointer->MyMethod(); } MyBool Function3() { return ObjectPointer != null; } MyBool Function4() { return How to reduce the width of the equation in a text paragraph? http://bovbjerg.net/cannot-be/why-few-operators-cannot-be-overloaded.php

We can overload few operators and few cannot be overloaded. Was it legal to rant against trick or treating via loudspeaker during halloween? Find the rate of change at a point on a polynomial How to reduce the width of the equation in a text paragraph? Since one is already allowed, then disallowing the other makes sense, and avoids lots of problem! –Nawaz Mar 15 '11 at 18:05 4 @TommyA: It allows a smart pointer object

Why Some Operators Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

Name :* Email Id :* Answer :* Verification Code Not readable? Is it possible to check where an alias was defined? Conversion operators must be member functions, and should not change the object which is being converted, so should be flagged as constant functions. Consider:

X a[10];
X* p = &a[3];
X* q = &a[3];
p++; // p points to a[4]
// thus the integer value of p must be
// sizeof(X) larger than the

For example:

class Y {
public:
void f();
// ...
};

class X { // assume that you can overload .
Y* p;
Y& operator.() { return *p; }
void f();
OneStopMBA.com - MBA EBooks, Tutorials, Articles, FAQs, Jobs, Training Institutes etc. There are compilers that perpetuate their incompatibilities with the standard just because their clients use those incompatible features. Why Dot Operator Cannot Be Overloaded double operator double() const; // error - return type included Operators which cannot be overloaded[edit] ?: (conditional) . (member selection) .* (member selection with pointer-to-member) :: (scope resolution) sizeof (object size

Polyglot Anagrams Robbers' Thread How to handle swear words in quote / transcription? Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Note that a function overloading expr1?expr2:expr3 would not be able to guarantee that only one of expr2 and expr3 was executed. ... At the time of standardization, it was not obvious which way would be best. If we allowed overloading of .

View Answer Can you explain the term "resource acquisition is initialization?" - Operators in C++ Interview Questions & Answers"> View Answer What is the difference between operator new and the new Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C# Can you dispel a magic effect you can't perceive? And use the quote formats. –Sebastian Mach Feb 17 '12 at 14:02 very good example and explanation. –Manju Mar 5 '13 at 13:11 2 The example is just Example bool Function1(); bool Function2(); Function1() && Function2(); If the result of Function1() is false, then Function2() is not called.

Operators That Cannot Be Overloaded In C++

Again what useful purpose would overloading the conditional operator produce? in particular would be a travesty. Why Some Operators Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ In fact, there are good reasons for not overloading any operator which doesn't evaluate all of its operands: you shouldn't overload && or || either (except in special cases). Why Scope Resolution Operator Cannot Be Overloaded This is done in the same fashion as defining a function.

This is done for classes where copying is to be prevented, and generally done with the addition of a privately declared copy constructor Example class DoNotCopyOrAssign { public: DoNotCopyOrAssign() {}; private: Get More Info have no predefined precedence.And if we want to overload these operator then compiler does not understand and conflicts, and generates an error. Why is looping over find's output bad practice? are allowed, so perhaps some clever but appalling dynamic dispatch hack that allows for expressing dot product as matrix1 . Which Operator Cannot Be Overloaded In C++ Using Friend Function

Oops! // The above problem can be fixed like so: class WithRawPointer2 { T *m_ptr; public: WithRawPointer2(T *ptr) : m_ptr(ptr) {} WithRawPointer2& operator=(WithRawPointer2 const &rhs) { if (this != &rhs) { Why Big Data is becoming so important? Sharepoint 2013: Rest API - does header need to include X-RequestDigest? http://bovbjerg.net/cannot-be/which-operators-cannot-be-overloaded-in-c.php This problem can be solved in several ways.

When overloaded, these operators get function call precedence, and this short circuit behavior is lost. Why Can't We Overload Some Operators In C++ That means you can't overload operator+ for int or double. The function implementing the overloaded ?: operator would not be able to guarantee that only the 'true' or 'false' branch is executed.

I just didn't see the need to introduce the special case of overloading a ternary operator.

Answers must not contain any bad words. or an object referred to by . Not the answer you're looking for? We Can Change The Basic Meaning Of An Operator In C++ What is the common, normally open, normally closed?

View Answer Difference between realloc() and free()? But according to Stroustrup he thought of several sensible resolutions for operator. defaultValue : p->getValue() where the type of defaultValue or p->getValue() causes overload resolution to pick up your overload. this page Where as && and || were "free", so there was no point in banning them, since it wasn't realized then how useless they would be. –James Kanze Jul 31 '13 at

Now we assume that I overload + operator, so C1+C2 internally translated as c1.operator+(c2) Now assume for the time beings you can overload '.' operator. US Election results 2016: What went wrong with prediction models? But having realized that overloading && and || was a mistake, no one was motivated to find the syntax. –James Kanze Mar 15 '11 at 19:06 add a comment| up vote Don't forget relation to implicit/explicit casts, make sure to cover return type...

Join them; it only takes a minute: Sign up Why can't you overload the '.' operator in C++? obj->data is defined as (*obj).data, so overloading it is basically equivalent to overloading the dereferencing operator. –filmor Mar 15 '11 at 18:08 9 @TommyA: There is a subtle, but significant Defining ?: as a token (even though it's only used in one place) isn't exactly rocket science. My initial guess is that overloading the operator will almost always violate number one or two of the principles given in the link above.

Can we overload *_cast<> operators?